
Bad-Pharma
This website is for information purposes only; we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any disease or medical condition by providing the information contained herein. Before beginning any natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.
READ BEFORE ENTERING; This website is for information purposes only; we are not diagnosing, treating, curing, mitigating, or preventing any disease or medical condition by providing the information contained herein. Before beginning any natural, integrative or conventional treatment regimen, it is advisable to seek the advice of a licensed healthcare professional.
Bad-Pharma
You should know…
Big Pharma’s Toxic Side Effects Kill
Donald W. Light explains how the FDA has become institutionally corrupt so that 90 percent of new approvals provide few or no advantages, and drugs are the 4th leading cause of death. Since the paper was published, we now update that to be the 3rd leading cause of death.
A 2013 paper entitled “Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs.” “About 2,460 people per week are estimated to die from drugs that were properly prescribed, and that’s based on detailed chart reviews of hospitalized patients,” says Donald Light, who is a professor of comparative health policy at Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Stratford, New Jersey.
Furthermore…
Big-Pharma has billions of dollars behind them. How many Big-Pharma commercials do you see a day? The brainwashing of the masses is standard practice throughout the world. What is the agenda of Big-Pharma? The almighty dollar or public health? Take a look at some information and think for yourself. We are Free Thinkers, so we won’t tell you what to think. We ask you to open your mind, read on, and forget everything you think you know for just a minute. We do show you some anti-pharma statistics here. It is the information they would rather you did not know. We show you mostly this side of the story because it is the ones that they suppress to keep it from you. You can get their side of the story very quickly. You have to spend quite some time digging for the truth to see the hidden side, so we focus on the suppressed information to bring it to you.
55,000 Deaths were from an FDA-approved medication—Vioxx.
Fact 2018:
The number one cause of death is Death By Doctor.
Some Facts & Science
We are not saying all medicines are bad. There are some excellent life-saving and emergency medications. We are saying that there are many deadly, toxic medications being prescribed unnecessarily in the name of profits. Here is the science that big pharma does not want you to see. Big Pharma owns the mainstream media, and they purposely keep this science/information from you. Not sure quite yet? Please read about how big pharma released Viox, knowing it would kill people and how 55,000 people or more have died at their hands from this drug alone. Some non-big pharma scientists put that number at 500,000.
We are not saying all medicines are bad. There are some excellent life-saving and emergency medications. We are saying that there are many deadly, toxic medications being prescribed unnecessarily in the name of profits. Here is the science that big pharma does not want you to see. Big Pharma owns the mainstream media, and they purposely keep this science/information from you. Not sure quite yet? Please read about how big pharma released Viox, knowing it would kill people and how 55,000 people or more have died at their hands from this drug alone. Some non-big pharma scientists put that number at 500,000.
Yes, there are life-saving drugs. Some drugs have more benefits than risks, but you must do your due diligence and find the facts to decide. Don’t let the Big-Pharma-trained doctors make that decision for you. Ask questions. Be a Free Thinker. Gather the facts. Are the risks worth it to you? Do you know the risks?
We are not hypocrites, but if you believe we are because we believe in some life-saving, life-altering medication, yet, we think many other toxic drugs with horrific adverse side effects are given unnecessarily, then so be it. Big pharma has to battle back and put all doctors, journalists, scientists, and the like in the class of quackery. They even have quackery websites to discredit real doctors or their adversaries. The educated doctor and or person who gathers facts is considered their enemy. They have no argument, so they must battle this way. Someone who names calls is generally someone who cannot debate facts and have a good argument.
Just because someone writes an article that says a doctor with a non-big pharma cure calls them a quack does not mean this is true. It’s big pharma’s only way to battle the competition and bring down those who spread the truth. Science is on the side of the person they deem a quack, so they must somehow discredit them. They spend a lot of money to keep you in the dark. Big pharma is in the business of suppressing the truth. It is part of the business plan. It is how they control and manipulate you. If you think they have your best interest at heart, I urge you to dig deep and find the facts that support that theory.
Just fewer than one-fourth (23.7%) of all NAS’s (new active substances) introduced between 1995 and 2010 had serious safety issues.
This article questions, “What is the percentage of drugs approved in Canada that subsequently either acquire serious safety warnings or have to be withdrawn from the market for safety reasons?”
An analysis conducted in 2011, based on a year of ADRs reported to the FDA, came to similar conclusions: Americans experienced “2.1 million serious injuries, including 128,000 patient deaths.” Other studies reveal that one in every five NMEs eventually caused enough serious harm in patients to warrant a severe warning or withdrawal from the market. Of priority drugs that were reviewed in slightly more than half the normal time, at least one in three of them caused serious harm.
J. Lexchin, “New Drugs and Safety: What Happened to New Active Substances Approved in Canada between 1995 and 2010?” Archives of Internal Medicine 172, no. 21 (2012): 1680-1681.